๐Ÿ›๏ธ Government & Public Sector

Built for the procurement realities of public sector HR

A staffing process that has to be defensible. Data that has to stay where the funding agreement says. A vendor evaluation that asks harder questions than any private-sector one. These are the constraints the platform was designed around.

Defensible, accessible, and in-country

Public sector staffing is judged on process as much as outcome. A decision that cannot be explained is a problem regardless of whether it was the right one.

๐Ÿ”’

Data residency, evidenced

Candidate and employee data held on in-country infrastructure and never crossing the border. For funded organisations this is a condition rather than a preference, and we will put where your data sits in writing before you commit.

๐Ÿงพ

Auditability as a default

Who posted, who screened, who approved, who decided, and when. Recorded as the process runs rather than reassembled afterwards when a decision is questioned.

โš–๏ธ

Competition-based staffing

Internal-first posting windows, defined eligibility, structured assessment against posted criteria, and a record of how each candidate was measured against them.

โ™ฟ

Accessible applications

The application is a public-facing service, and in this sector it is held to that standard. Ask us about the application experience specifically during your evaluation — see our accessibility statement for how we talk about this.

๐Ÿข

Multi-department structure

Departments and agencies with their own hiring managers, approval chains and classifications, without each one needing its own instance or its own administrator.

๐Ÿ“„

Vendor documentation

Security questionnaires completed against your template, a Data Processing Agreement reviewed as part of contracting, and subprocessors named. The step that usually stalls an evaluation.

What we will tell you before you commit

Procurement in this sector is slow because vendors are vague. We would rather answer these early, in writing, and be ruled out quickly if we are not right.

Where the data lives

Storage and backup regions, and which subprocessors touch it.

What implementation includes

What is in scope, what is not, and who does the configuration.

What changes cost

Which changes your administrators make unaided, and which are billable.

How you leave

What you get back, in what format, and how long it takes.

Send us your requirements

If you have a requirements matrix or a security questionnaire already drafted, send it. We will complete it and tell you honestly where we do not meet a requirement.

Book a demo โ†’
Free guide โ€” no email required
Before you switch ATS,
read this first.

A working guide to evaluating and switching your ATS in 90 days: an RFP question set, a vendor scorecard, and the questions vendors would rather you did not ask. Free, no form required.

Read the guide →

No thanks, I'll figure it out myself
๐Ÿ“… Book a Free Demo